According to a statement published by lawmakers on June 21, the US Government Department of Commerce has announced the addition of drone manufacturer Autel Robotics to its “blacklist.” The “entity list” is a compilation of foreign individuals, companies, and organizations deemed a national security concern. This designation subjects Autel Robotics to export restrictions and specific licensing requirements for certain technologies and goods.
Statement from Lawmakers Moolenaar and Stefanik
In November 2023, Chairman John Moolenaar (R-MI) of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party and Congresswoman Elise Stefanik (R-NY) called for the Biden administration to scrutinize Autel’s activities. In a press release published June 21, they released a joint statement:
Chairman John Moolenaar (R-MI) of the House Select Committee on the Chinese Communist Party and Congresswoman Elise Stefanik (R-NY) released the below statement following news last week that the Department of Commerce placed Chinese drone maker, Autel, on its blacklist which prohibits American companies from doing business with the company. The Department’s decision came after bipartisan demands last year for the Biden administration to investigate Autel. In the November 2023 request, Moolenaar and Stefanik unveiled Autel’s deep connections to the Chinese military.
“Following our advocacy, the Commerce Department added malign Chinese controlled drone maker, Autel, to its government blacklist. No American should support companies like DJI and Autel that are arming Communist China and have the ability to spy on American soil. While this is a strong first step, the Senate must now take up and pass the House-passed Countering CCP Drones Act and ban the introduction of new CCP-linked drones from American skies.”
This development underscores the heightened scrutiny and regulatory measures being directed at Chinese technology firms over national security concerns.
Understanding the Entity List
The Entity List, maintained by the Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) under the US Department of Commerce, identifies foreign persons—including businesses, research institutions, government and private organizations, and individuals—subject to specific licensing requirements for the export, reexport, and transfer (in-country) of specified items. Found in Supplement No. 4 to Part 744 of the Export Administration Regulations (EAR), the Entity List imposes additional licensing requirements and policies on these entities, beyond those stipulated elsewhere in the EAR.
The addition of Autel Robotics to the Entity List means the company will now face hurdles in obtaining the necessary licenses for the export, reexport, or transfer of certain items.
Autel Robotics’ Response
Autel Robotics, a leading provider of digital solutions for the unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) industry, has responded to this development by reiterating its commitment to ethical practices and compliance with international regulations. In a statement published in December of last year, following pressure from lawmakers to add Autel to the entity list, the company emphasized its dedication to civilian applications of drone technology and its strict adherence to control requirements related to the sale, transfer, export, re-export, and disposal of hardware, software, and technology.
“Autel Robotics is firmly against the use of drone products for military purposes or any activities that infringe upon human rights,” the company stated. “We strictly adhere to all applicable control requirements related to the sale, transfer, export, re-export, and disposal of hardware, software, and technology. This commitment is not only aimed at earning the trust of our partners and the public but also at mitigating corporate operating risks and fulfilling our corporate responsibility as a member of the international market.”
Autel also addressed concerns about the misuse of its technology, calling such concerns “unfounded and speculative.” The company clarified that its drones are explicitly designed for civilian use and are not intended for military purposes. Autel conducts rigorous blacklist scans of customers, freight forwarders, and employees and performs thorough due diligence on potential partners to ensure compliance and mitigate risks.
Read more:
- DJI Blacklisted by Department of Commerce: U.S. Goverment Adds Company to “Entity” List
- What is the Countering CCP Drones Act, and What Does it Mean for DJI Drones?
- NDAA Passed the House: What That Means for the Countering CCP Drones Act, and What Comes Next
Miriam McNabb is the Editor-in-Chief of DRONELIFE and CEO of JobForDrones, a professional drone services marketplace, and a fascinated observer of the emerging drone industry and the regulatory environment for drones. Miriam has penned over 3,000 articles focused on the commercial drone space and is an international speaker and recognized figure in the industry. Miriam has a degree from the University of Chicago and over 20 years of experience in high tech sales and marketing for new technologies.
For drone industry consulting or writing, Email Miriam.
TWITTER:@spaldingbarker
Subscribe to DroneLife here.
where are iPhones made…China..ok so ban them as well. what about most technology in cameras on vehicles or on other phones, etc. it’s all China. The only thing this does is hurt regular people that use these drones for work or for fun. the tariffs just take money out of American’s pockets that buy the item. There are no US companies making drones and when there were they were double the cost..so unaffordable. “Congresswoman Elise Stefanik introduced the Drones for First Responders (DFR) Act” that is just a BS title. just because some of the tariff money they steal from the American tax payer goes to fund first responders getting drones I think the correct name is Tariff on select Chinese companies to take more money out of American pockets act. Skydio makes drones for first responders..I wonder if Stefanik owns any stock in that company?
My company very happy your information
This
That now leaves no options for US drone operators, being that all drones are manufactured in China! There are zero US manufacturers churning out prosumer drones! So I guess that’s it, no more drones in the sky until we have a company step up to the plate to make drones here in the US?