• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to secondary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • DroneRacingLife
  • DroneFlyers
  • Newsletter
DroneLife

DRONELIFE

Stay up to date on all the latest Drone News

  • News
  • Products
  • Industries
    • Agriculture
    • Construction
    • Delivery
    • Dual Use
    • Inspection
    • Public Safety
    • Surveying
  • Enthusiasts
  • Regulations
  • Business
  • Video
  • Podcasts

Federal Agencies Move Quickly to Turn SAFER SKIES Act Into Operational Reality

July 7, 2026 by Miriam McNabb Leave a Comment

New DOJ/DHS rule and coordinated FCC actions establish the legal, technical, and spectrum framework for trained state and local agencies to deploy counter-drone systems

The federal government’s expansion of state and local counter-drone authority took a major step forward this week as the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Department of Justice (DOJ), and Federal Communications Commission (FCC) released a coordinated package of actions designed to move the SAFER SKIES Act from legislation to implementation.

At the center of the effort is an Interim Final Rule published by DHS and DOJ that establishes the regulatory framework for state, local, Tribal, and territorial (SLTT) law enforcement and correctional agencies to conduct authorized counter-unmanned aircraft system (C-UAS) operations. The agencies are accepting public comments on the rule through September 6.

At nearly the same time, the FCC issued four companion actions addressing communications, spectrum, equipment authorization, and legal questions that could otherwise have slowed deployment of counter-drone capabilities. Together, the actions represent one of the most significant expansions of practical counter-UAS authority for state and local agencies since Congress passed the SAFER SKIES Act as part of the FY2026 National Defense Authorization Act.

Building the Framework

The SAFER SKIES Act expanded counter-UAS authority beyond a handful of federal agencies by allowing trained SLTT law enforcement and correctional agencies to detect, track, disable, or seize drones that pose a credible threat to public safety, critical infrastructure, correctional facilities, or major public events. That authority, however, depended on implementing regulations establishing how agencies would qualify, what systems they could use, and how operations would be conducted.

The new Interim Final Rule fills in those details. It establishes training and certification requirements, reporting procedures, oversight mechanisms, and operational safeguards. It also creates two key resources that will guide deployments: an Authorized Technologies List, identifying approved categories of counter-UAS technologies, and an Authorized Systems List, identifying specific approved systems at the make-and-model level. Both lists will be maintained through the FBI’s Law Enforcement Enterprise Portal (LEEP).

The rule also emphasizes that SLTT agencies operating radio frequency-based counter-UAS equipment must obtain FCC authorization in addition to meeting DOJ and DHS requirements, highlighting the importance of the FCC’s simultaneous actions.

FCC Removes Operational Barriers

Rather than waiting for agencies to navigate multiple regulatory processes independently, the FCC released four coordinated decisions intended to remove practical obstacles to implementation.

The most immediate action grants a 180-day blanket Special Temporary Authority (STA) allowing eligible SLTT agencies operating under the SAFER SKIES Act to use approved counter-UAS systems while longer-term authorization mechanisms are developed. The order also waives certain Commission rules as necessary to permit those authorized operations.

In a separate order, the FCC’s Office of Engineering and Technology waived several equipment authorization requirements that would otherwise prevent manufacturers from importing or marketing approved RF-based counter-UAS systems before receiving traditional FCC equipment authorization. The waiver applies only to systems included on the Authorized Systems List and only for sale to eligible SLTT agencies operating under the Act.

The practical effect is to reduce delays between federal approval of a counter-UAS system and its availability to qualified public safety agencies.

Clarifying Longstanding Legal Questions

Perhaps the most consequential FCC action addresses Section 333 of the Communications Act, which prohibits willful or malicious interference with authorized radio communications.

“No person shall willfully or maliciously interfere with or cause interference to any radio communications of any station licensed or authorized by or under this chapter or operated by the United States Government.”

Because many counter-UAS systems use radio frequency techniques to disrupt communication between a drone and its operator, questions have persisted about whether those technologies could legally be used by non-federal entities.

In one declaratory ruling, the FCC concluded that Section 333 does not apply to the federal government itself. The Commission also clarified that non-federal entities acting on behalf of or under the oversight of the federal government, including qualified SLTT personnel operating under the SAFER SKIES Act, may receive derivative immunity from Section 333 liability when conducting authorized counter-UAS operations.

A companion ruling addresses manufacturers and developers, clarifying that parties operating under FCC experimental authorization may test signal-jamming technologies under specified conditions without violating Section 333, provided they control both the jamming equipment and the drone communications involved in the testing.

For developers of counter-UAS technologies, the clarification provides additional legal certainty during product development and testing.

Significant Guardrails Remain

While the coordinated actions substantially expand operational capability, they do not authorize unrestricted counter-drone activities.

Agencies must still satisfy federal training and certification requirements, use systems included on the Authorized Systems List, comply with operational restrictions established under the SAFER SKIES Act, document mitigation actions, and report qualifying operations to federal authorities. The authority also remains limited to addressing credible threats to specified people, facilities, assets, events, critical infrastructure, and correctional institutions.

The FCC’s own fact sheet emphasizes that its actions are intended to support implementation of the SAFER SKIES Act by clarifying legal authority, providing temporary spectrum access, allowing approved equipment to reach qualified agencies more quickly, and enabling lawful testing and operation of counter-UAS technologies.

From Policy to Capability

The coordinated rollout marks another milestone in the federal government’s evolving approach to drone security.

Congress established new authorities through the SAFER SKIES Act. Executive Orders issued in June 2025 directed agencies to accelerate both drone innovation and counter-drone capabilities. The new Interim Final Rule and accompanying FCC actions begin translating those policies into an operational framework for state and local agencies.

For public safety organizations, the actions provide greater clarity on how authorized counter-UAS operations can be conducted. For manufacturers, they reduce regulatory uncertainty surrounding development, testing, and deployment of approved systems. And for the broader drone industry, they demonstrate that federal agencies are moving beyond establishing legal authority toward building the operational and regulatory infrastructure needed to support expanded counter-UAS operations across the United States.

With the Interim Final Rule now open for public comment through September 6, stakeholders throughout the drone, public safety, and counter-UAS communities have an opportunity to help shape how this new framework evolves before it is finalized.

Read more:

  • SAFER SKIES: A Long-Awaited Update to America’s Drone Security Playbook
  • From “Predictable Surprise” to Policy Priority: The Push for Faster Counter-Drone Deployment
  • DRONELIFE Exclusive Interview: Andrew Giuliani on the Race to Secure the 2026 World Cup
Miriam McNabb

Miriam McNabb is the Editor-in-Chief of DRONELIFE and CEO of JobForDrones, a professional drone services marketplace, and a fascinated observer of the emerging drone industry and the regulatory environment for drones. Miriam has penned over 3,000 articles focused on the commercial drone space and is an international speaker and recognized figure in the industry.  Miriam has a degree from the University of Chicago and over 20 years of experience in high tech sales and marketing for new technologies.
For drone industry consulting or writing, Email Miriam.

TWITTER:@spaldingbarker

Subscribe to DroneLife here.

Filed Under: Applications, C-UAS, Drone News, Drone News Feeds, emergency response, Featured, Featured – Safety and Security, Fire and Police, Law Enforcement, News, Public Safety, Public Safety, Selected – Safety and Security Tagged With: Counter UAS, counter-UAS rules, Critical Infrastructure, DHS, DOJ, drone mitigation, Drone Policy, Drone Regulation, Drone Security, FCC, law enforcement drones, Public Safety Drones, SAFER SKIES Act, Section 333, UAS security

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

LATEST

Is Trump’s Plan to Build a U.S. Drone Industry Working?

Foreign manufacturers are pursuing U.S. production, domestic companies are attracting investment, and Pentagon orders are growing. But can the industry…

Continue Reading Is Trump’s Plan to Build a U.S. Drone Industry Working?

Drone Activity Disrupts Jersey Airport for Two Consecutive Nights

Police are appealing for witnesses after multiple drones entered restricted airspace on October 30 and 31. The Government of Jersey…

Continue Reading Drone Activity Disrupts Jersey Airport for Two Consecutive Nights

Navy DRPM RAS Seeks Cargo Drones for Marine Corps

The new robotic and autonomous systems portfolio office will host a cargo drone demonstration in Huntsville in early 2027. Strong…

Continue Reading Navy DRPM RAS Seeks Cargo Drones for Marine Corps

Blue Marble Geographics Introduces New Global Mapper Subscription for GIS and Drone Mapping

Three subscription tiers bring mapping, terrain analysis, lidar processing, and photogrammetry tools into a unified offering. Blue Marble Geographics has…

Continue Reading Blue Marble Geographics Introduces New Global Mapper Subscription for GIS and Drone Mapping

DOE Launches Battery Manufacturing Initiative to Strengthen U.S. Supply Chain

New national consortium aims to reduce production costs and speed commercialization of advanced batteries, including those used in drones. The…

Continue Reading DOE Launches Battery Manufacturing Initiative to Strengthen U.S. Supply Chain

FEMA’s $250 Million Counter-Drone Grant Deadline Approaches: Applications Due November 16

Nationwide funding supports counter-UAS capabilities for state and local agencies, but questions remain about whether the funding will meet demand.…

Continue Reading FEMA’s $250 Million Counter-Drone Grant Deadline Approaches: Applications Due November 16

Matternet Gains Access to More Than 2,300 North American Hospitals Through Swisslog Healthcare Partnership

New distribution agreement could give Matternet a competitive advantage in hospital drone delivery by leveraging an established healthcare sales network.…

Continue Reading Matternet Gains Access to More Than 2,300 North American Hospitals Through Swisslog Healthcare Partnership

FCC Opens 50 MHz of Cellular Spectrum for Drone Operations

New rules remove a decades-old restriction on airborne use of the 800 MHz Cellular band. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC)…

Continue Reading FCC Opens 50 MHz of Cellular Spectrum for Drone Operations

Zipline Announces Quieter Drone Deliveries as Communities Raise Noise Concerns

New flight software reduces modeled sound exposure by 68%, addressing a growing concern as drone delivery expands into residential areas.…

Continue Reading Zipline Announces Quieter Drone Deliveries as Communities Raise Noise Concerns

FCC Proposes New Rules for Drone Communications and Counter-Drone Radar

November vote would expand low-altitude aviation data links, support drone-detection radar, and update satellite connectivity rules. The Federal Communications Commission…

Continue Reading FCC Proposes New Rules for Drone Communications and Counter-Drone Radar

Secondary Sidebar

Footer

SPONSORED

drone cleaning

Do Cleaning Drones Actually Work? 15 Apellix Before-and-After Jobs Show the Results

What Is the Best Commercial Cleaning Drone in 2026? Specs, Prices, and a Head-to-Head Comparison

Inspired Flight Gremsy IF800 VIO F1 drones geo week

What Will It Take to Strengthen U.S. Drone Manufacturing? A Conversation with Inspired Flight’s CEO

Global Mapper Mobile data collection

Collection Ground Control Points with Global Mapper Mobile

Military Drone Mapping Solutions

How SimActive’s Correlator3D™ is Revolutionizing Military Mapping: An Exclusive Interview with CEO Philippe Simard

Photogrammetry Accuracy Standards

SimActive Photogrammetry Software: Enabling Users to Meet Accuracy Standards for Over 20 Years

About Us | Contact Us | Advertise With Us | Write for Us | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service

The Trusted Source for the Business of Drones.

This website uses cookies and third party services. By clicking OK, you are agreeing to our privacy policy. ACCEPT

Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT