At the AUVSI XPONENTIAL 2026 conference this week, Red Cat Holdings executive Brendan Stewart delivered one of the more historically grounded and economically detailed discussions of the event, arguing that rebuilding the U.S. drone industry will require long-term industrial policy, manufacturing scale, and patience.
Stewart, Senior Vice President of Regulatory and Government Affairs at Red Cat, spoke during a session titled “Industrial Policy: America’s Secret Weapon for Drone Dominance.”
Red Cat is a U.S.-based manufacturer focused on military and dual-use drone systems. During the session, Stewart framed the current drone manufacturing debate not as a short-term political issue, but as part of a decades-long shift in how nations approach industrial capacity.
He opened by comparing recent U.S. industrial policy with the state-supported manufacturing strategy enacted in China over the last several decades. Rather than focusing on politics, Stewart emphasized differences in manufacturing philosophy, long-term planning, and ecosystem development.
“Industrial policy built America,” Stewart said, referring to circa WWII policies that helped develop manufacturing in the US.
He argued that the United States gradually moved away from prioritizing domestic production.
“Factories became liabilities, Wall Street beat Main Street, offshoring became ‘strategy,’ and America got hooked on cheap and convenient,” Stewart said.
Stewart contrasted that with the manufacturing expansion that took place in China over the same period. “While America Financialized, China Industrialized,” he said.
Wright’s Law and the Scale Problem
At the center of Stewart’s argument was a manufacturing principle known as Wright’s Law.
Originally developed by aerospace engineer Theodore Wright in the 1930s, Wright’s Law holds that manufacturing costs decrease as production volume increases. As companies build more units, they gain efficiencies in sourcing, labor, tooling, and supply chains.
Stewart argued that this principle explains why scaling domestic drone manufacturing matters more than simply assembling small numbers of aircraft inside the United States.
“The labor gap doesn’t drive a significant proportion of the cost,” Stewart said. “The issue is that we’re buying parts in hundreds, not in the hundreds of thousands that could drive costs down.”
That idea formed the core of his broader argument for industrial policy. According to Stewart, governments often play a key role during the early stages of strategic industries because scale itself creates lower costs over time.
“Government takes initial risk and because it’s dual use, it scales everywhere,” Stewart said, referencing technologies like GPS that began as government-supported programs before becoming commercially ubiquitous.
Stewart also argued that the United States cannot rebuild manufacturing dominance instantly.
“That’s not something that happens just because you will it into existence,” he said.
He acknowledged the reality that increasing domestic production capacity may initially result in higher prices and slower timelines.
“We’re undoing 35 years of bad policy. Things will cost more and take longer for a while,” Stewart said.
Still, he maintained that scaling production is ultimately the only path toward lower-cost American-made systems.
“Like planting a tree, the best time to start a drone industry was 18 years ago. The second best time is today,” Stewart said.
Beyond Defense Applications
Stewart acknowledged that recreational and prosumer drone users have borne much of the impact from restrictions and limitations placed on drones manufactured in China.
According to Stewart, expanding domestic manufacturing could eventually support a broader ecosystem that includes defense, enterprise, recreational, and prosumer markets alike.
The session offered a notably pragmatic perspective on the future of the U.S. drone industry. Rather than promising quick solutions, Stewart presented a historic model of industrial policy and manufacturing scale as long-term structural challenges that will require sustained investment and coordination across government and industry.
Read more:
- Drone Dominance: The Defense Department’s Push to Build a Scalable U.S. Drone Supply Chain
- Skydio Raises $110M Series F, Signals Strong Revenue and U.S. Manufacturing Push
- Vector Secures $20M J.P. Morgan Loan to Scale U.S. sUAS Manufacturing
Miriam McNabb is the Editor-in-Chief of DRONELIFE and CEO of JobForDrones, a professional drone services marketplace, and a fascinated observer of the emerging drone industry and the regulatory environment for drones. Miriam has penned over 3,000 articles focused on the commercial drone space and is an international speaker and recognized figure in the industry. Miriam has a degree from the University of Chicago and over 20 years of experience in high tech sales and marketing for new technologies.
For drone industry consulting or writing, Email Miriam.
TWITTER:@spaldingbarker
Subscribe to DroneLife here.
This is a good take. I do not agree with the previous and this administration’s decision of legislating the competition out of the market as that is harmful to the drone industry, I very much do want to see the American drone market succeed and get better. The money that was spent lobbying against DJI should have been used to better their products and improve their production scaling.
I think that like China had helped DJI at the beginning the American government should be providing grants and other financial help to develop the tech level and the scaling required for the American drone industry to thrive in the future.
So, why then can foreign made drones not fill the gap for commercial, prosumer, and recreational drones now? They made the right decision 18 years ago and now the USA, punishes them for it by the elimination of their products.
That is not industrialization it is industrial espionage.
Play fair, learn from the leaders in the industry, share the wealth and technology.