It is past time for the government to realize and act on the benefits and opportunities that UAV technology can deliver. The technology is a major economic driver of jobs and business opportunities. And, as Hurricane Harvey amply brought into sharp relief, drones are life savers.
This is all known by people working in the industry. The ability of drones to assist in search and rescue efforts is well understood. Mike Winn, CEO of DroneDeploy, a data analytics firm, ticked off three quick ways in which drones can be of use in hurricane disaster recovery effort:
Winn summed up this knowledge:
Drones can be 6 times quicker than rescuers in locating people — while a 5-person rescue team needs 2 hours to find a victim, a drone can find that same victim in 20 minutes. They also keep rescuers safe by relaying live images of the scene, ensuring rescue operations can be planned with minimal risk.
Drones can safely deliver supplies like rescue ropes and life jackets in perilous situations (like raging floodwaters) which are too dangerous for rescuers to attempt.
Natural disasters leave victims with extreme property damage. Commercial drones, which can aerially survey damage, can help insurance adjusters scope out the scene when roads are dangerous or impassable.
Firms large and small (including but not limited to Measure, Airbus Aerial, Insitu, DJI, PropellerHeads) are among the drone companies providing equipment and services, is one of the drone firms that has been assisting. DroneLife has published several posts on drone use in recovery effort:
That drones help rather than hinder is known. So, it would be encouraging to see government agencies and our elected representatives act to develop clear policies and regulations that abet relief efforts and help this industry advance.
The WSJ writes: “The House is considering a 2018 FAA reauthorization bill that, among other things, calls for putting in place consensus safety standards for drone designs developed by industry representatives. The legislation also calls for further study of local and state governmental authorities to oversee drone operations under certain scenarios.”(emphasis ours). No – we do not need further study. This recent natural disaster has delivered all the study we need. We need commitment, vision, and strategy – not study.
Here is another example of what we do not need. Just last Friday Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, Democrat of Rhode Island, and Representative Jim Langevin, a Rhode Island Congressman, wrote a piece, titled We must act to protect manned aircraft from irresponsible drone operators published in The Hill. They have re-introduced the Drone & Operator Safety Act in the Senate and House of Representatives. They argue that the act “would, for the first time, make it a criminal offense to knowingly or recklessly fly a drone in a way that interferes with, or disrupts the operation of, a manned aircraft.”
Call us crazy, but you have to ask if the inmates are running the asylum when you live in a world where Congress will not impose national regulations on the use of military assault weapons which cost lives (Newtown, Aurora, etc.) and yet rush to impose regulations on technology that has clearly demonstrated the ability to save lives.
The regulations needed are those that will expand the benefits the technology can deliver (e.g. BVLOS, etc.).
Hurricane Irma is picking up steam and may or may not come ashore. But if not Irma, then it will be something else. Droughts, wild fires, hurricanes, severe snow storms are all becoming more fierce and more frequent. Drone technology can help, and the companies and executives that manage them are ready, willing, and able to assist. Government needs to step up, engage, and plan. Let’s hope we can learn from the lessons Hurricane Harvey is teaching us.
Frank Schroth is editor in chief of DroneLife, the authoritative source for news and analysis on the drone industry: it’s people, products, trends, and events. Email Frank
TWITTER:@fschroth
This website uses cookies and third party services. By clicking OK, you are agreeing to our privacy policy. ACCEPT
Manage consent
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
Cookie
Duration
Description
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional
11 months
The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy
11 months
The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Will Our Government Learn the Lessons Hurricane Harvey Can Teach re: Drones
Hurricane Harvey Impacts
It is past time for the government to realize and act on the benefits and opportunities that UAV technology can deliver. The technology is a major economic driver of jobs and business opportunities. And, as Hurricane Harvey amply brought into sharp relief, drones are life savers.
This is all known by people working in the industry. The ability of drones to assist in search and rescue efforts is well understood. Mike Winn, CEO of DroneDeploy, a data analytics firm, ticked off three quick ways in which drones can be of use in hurricane disaster recovery effort:
Winn summed up this knowledge:
Firms large and small (including but not limited to Measure, Airbus Aerial, Insitu, DJI, PropellerHeads) are among the drone companies providing equipment and services, is one of the drone firms that has been assisting. DroneLife has published several posts on drone use in recovery effort:
And a slew of stories has come out over the weekend:
That drones help rather than hinder is known. So, it would be encouraging to see government agencies and our elected representatives act to develop clear policies and regulations that abet relief efforts and help this industry advance.
The WSJ writes: “The House is considering a 2018 FAA reauthorization bill that, among other things, calls for putting in place consensus safety standards for drone designs developed by industry representatives. The legislation also calls for further study of local and state governmental authorities to oversee drone operations under certain scenarios.”(emphasis ours). No – we do not need further study. This recent natural disaster has delivered all the study we need. We need commitment, vision, and strategy – not study.
Here is another example of what we do not need. Just last Friday Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, Democrat of Rhode Island, and Representative Jim Langevin, a Rhode Island Congressman, wrote a piece, titled We must act to protect manned aircraft from irresponsible drone operators published in The Hill. They have re-introduced the Drone & Operator Safety Act in the Senate and House of Representatives. They argue that the act “would, for the first time, make it a criminal offense to knowingly or recklessly fly a drone in a way that interferes with, or disrupts the operation of, a manned aircraft.”
Call us crazy, but you have to ask if the inmates are running the asylum when you live in a world where Congress will not impose national regulations on the use of military assault weapons which cost lives (Newtown, Aurora, etc.) and yet rush to impose regulations on technology that has clearly demonstrated the ability to save lives.
The regulations needed are those that will expand the benefits the technology can deliver (e.g. BVLOS, etc.).
Hurricane Irma is picking up steam and may or may not come ashore. But if not Irma, then it will be something else. Droughts, wild fires, hurricanes, severe snow storms are all becoming more fierce and more frequent. Drone technology can help, and the companies and executives that manage them are ready, willing, and able to assist. Government needs to step up, engage, and plan. Let’s hope we can learn from the lessons Hurricane Harvey is teaching us.
Frank Schroth is editor in chief of DroneLife, the authoritative source for news and analysis on the drone industry: it’s people, products, trends, and events.
Email Frank
TWITTER:@fschroth
See Also