News and Commentary. Drones equipped with loudspeaker systems are now being commonly used in the Covid-19 crisis to monitor communities for compliance to public safety orders – but some readers complain that being watched by police from the air is just plain “creepy.”
The FAA says it is investigating a “Volunteer Drone Task Force” flying over Manhattan parks to remind people of social distancing. While that drone isn’t operated by public safety officials, the idea has been embraced in other U.S. cities and around the world. Police in Daytona Beach, Florida were the first in the U.S. to use drones to disperse crowds: the method allows police to maintain a safe distance and protect themselves from infection, while providing a gentle reminder to maintain appropriate space. According to a report in The Hill, police in Savannah, Georgia will also use drones to enforce social distancing: “We are in the middle of a crisis. We’re on our peak time frame and we’re serious about social distancing. The reason why we have so many cases we have is because, two weeks ago people felt that life was normal. It is not normal,” Van Johnson, mayor of Savannah, said.
In Massachusetts, the local ABC news channel reports that police in their state are also considering using drones to monitor social distancing, saying that during the Covid-19 crisis, the benefits of the technology must be weighed against any privacy concerns. In Connecticut, the Hartford Courant reports, police in some communities will use drone in public parks to enforce distancing. New Jersey also has announced plans to launch a drone announcement program.
Police have already adopted drones as a tool to monitor communities around the world. In Germany, Kazakhstan, China, France, and other countries, drones are flying near to crowds and playing recorded messages.
These drones can play a useful – and safe – role in ensuring that people adhere to health guidelines during the Covid-19 crisis. Used legally and appropriately, they protect both public safety officers and the public. The tone of the messages, however, may make a difference to how these drones are received. As DRONELIFE reports on the use of drones for community monitoring, email comments from readers make a common point: the word “creepy” appears in almost every message: the idea of being observed from the air is uncomfortable for many citizens. In these extreme times, police should ensure that they are transparent and communicative about the use of this new tool – so that drones are seen as “useful”, rather than the “creepy.”
Miriam McNabb is the Editor-in-Chief of DRONELIFE and CEO of JobForDrones, a professional drone services marketplace, and a fascinated observer of the emerging drone industry and the regulatory environment for drones. Miriam has penned over 3,000 articles focused on the commercial drone space and is an international speaker and recognized figure in the industry. Miriam has a degree from the University of Chicago and over 20 years of experience in high tech sales and marketing for new technologies.
For drone industry consulting or writing, Email Miriam.
TWITTER:@spaldingbarker
Subscribe to DroneLife here.
[…] A Conn. town backtracks on drone based covid-19 usage due to security concerns. The town of Westport, Conn which is located 52 miles northeast of NYC, which is the current epicenter of the Covid-19 outbreak in the US, has announced that it has scrapped plans to use drone technology to detect fevers and coughing as a tool to help fight corona virus given push back about concerns with privacy. […]