Site icon DRONELIFE

In Case You Missed It…Drone Stories from the Week of 4/11/14

Sensefly, the Switzerland-based branch of Parrot announced eBee Ag, a new fully autonomous aerial imaging drone for precision agriculture applications. “The eBee Ag enables growers and coop consultants to become much more precise in their work,” said Jean-Christophe Zufferey, C.E.O. of senseFly, in the press release. “The detail provided by its customised cameras and its software’s index calculations allow customers to analyse crop conditions remotely and in high detail. This means less time wasted on manual checks and less reliance on low-resolution satellite images or costly airplane shots. With the accurate and timely data the eBee Ag supplies, farmers can optimise their crop management and chemical usage – saving them time, saving them money, and helping them boost their yields.”

An MIT PhD candidate has developed a drone that self-charges by landing on power lines. The drone is equipped with a magnetometer which detects magnetic fields given off by power lines. From there, its just a matter of tapping into the power. No word yet on how electric companies would feel about having their product stolen and powering the get-away vehicle. Full story here

Thermal images captured by a drone led archaeologists to discover never-before-seen structures in a thousand year old Native American settlement, known as Blue J, buried under the New Mexican desert. “This work illustrates the very important role that UAVs (unmanned aerial vehicles) have for scientific research,” Jesse Casana, an archaeologist from the University of Arkansas, told the Huffington Post. “When legislators think about use of technology, they often don’t think about science. They need to come up with some regulations. Until they do, it’s really kind of hamstringing science.”

Forbes contributor Sean Lawson wrote a fantastic OpEd called in which he discusses how it is time the FAA gave up on its charade of control. He astutely points out that “the first, most obvious point to make here is that a lack of rules does not serve as a foundation for banning an activity. In fact, it is just the opposite. The use of a new technology is legal until the government makes it illegal or regulates its use in some way, not the other way around.”

 

Exit mobile version