This past week the Trump administration issued an executive order that requires the government to eliminate two regulations for every new regulation it passes. The goal, one would assume, is to help cut down on government bureaucracy. But will it have unintended consequences? Lisa Ellman, chair of the Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Group for Hogan Lovells, an international law firm, and co-executive director of the Commercial Drone Alliance, believes it might.
In commentary published on The Hill Ms. Elllman writes that “it is important to realize that some regulations actually enable economic activity, rather than inhibit it. This is counter-intuitive, but critical in the world of commercial drones.”
The concern is that new anti-regulaton policies could impede the developing industry and the ability of the United States to establish a leadership position in that industry. Some argue that the fluid regulatory environment have impeded the industry’s development. While that might be debated, it cannot be debated that the US has been eclipsed by Asian firms in low cost drone hardware (e.g DJI, Yuneec, Autel).
Ellman maintains that industry “needs regulations that enable safe flights beyond the scope of current rules. Otherwise, the industry’s growth will be halted. ”
She concludes:
For the industry to truly take off, we need rulemakings from the FAA that broadly authorize these types of operations in a way that is safe. The FAA is working on these rulemakings now, and the White House should encourage their timely release.
While some regulations are overly limiting, other regulations enable economic growth. The Trump administration can move quickly to design and implement a sensible regulatory framework for unmanned aircraft systems that promotes innovation while protecting the public interest, in order to maintain our nation’s competitive edge, fully exploit the incredible public interest benefits of this technology, and move into the next generation of unmanned flight.
Let’s use rules to remove bureaucratic red tape, and safely propel the industry forward.
It is a strong and compelling argument that the administration should listen to. There are a number of American firms that are beginning to take the lead on the software side of the equation with sophisticated cloud based data analytic processing that can deliver important business intelligence for a variety of vertical markets.
The FAA moves slowly. This requirement will only serve to potentially further slow them down. As Elllman notes regulations can also be enabling. Whenever there is a lack of guidance and direction, there is risk and, consequently, reluctance. You can find the full text of Ms. Ellman’s article here.
Frank Schroth is editor in chief of DroneLife, the authoritative source for news and analysis on the drone industry: it’s people, products, trends, and events. Email Frank
TWITTER:@fschroth
This website uses cookies and third party services. By clicking OK, you are agreeing to our privacy policy. ACCEPT
Manage consent
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
Cookie
Duration
Description
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional
11 months
The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy
11 months
The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Will Trump’s Freeze on Regulations Delay Growth of the Commercial Drone Industry?
This past week the Trump administration issued an executive order that requires the government to eliminate two regulations for every new regulation it passes. The goal, one would assume, is to help cut down on government bureaucracy. But will it have unintended consequences? Lisa Ellman, chair of the Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Group for Hogan Lovells, an international law firm, and co-executive director of the Commercial Drone Alliance, believes it might.
In commentary published on The Hill Ms. Elllman writes that “it is important to realize that some regulations actually enable economic activity, rather than inhibit it. This is counter-intuitive, but critical in the world of commercial drones.”
The concern is that new anti-regulaton policies could impede the developing industry and the ability of the United States to establish a leadership position in that industry. Some argue that the fluid regulatory environment have impeded the industry’s development. While that might be debated, it cannot be debated that the US has been eclipsed by Asian firms in low cost drone hardware (e.g DJI, Yuneec, Autel).
Ellman maintains that industry “needs regulations that enable safe flights beyond the scope of current rules. Otherwise, the industry’s growth will be halted. ”
She concludes:
It is a strong and compelling argument that the administration should listen to. There are a number of American firms that are beginning to take the lead on the software side of the equation with sophisticated cloud based data analytic processing that can deliver important business intelligence for a variety of vertical markets.
The FAA moves slowly. This requirement will only serve to potentially further slow them down. As Elllman notes regulations can also be enabling. Whenever there is a lack of guidance and direction, there is risk and, consequently, reluctance. You can find the full text of Ms. Ellman’s article here.
Frank Schroth is editor in chief of DroneLife, the authoritative source for news and analysis on the drone industry: it’s people, products, trends, and events.
Email Frank
TWITTER:@fschroth
See Also